Autocratic. However, the autocratic style can be a double-edged sword because it alienates employees who want to take more ownership of their job and the company’s future successes, potentially decreasing overall performance and increasing employee turnover rates. Autocratic managers lead with very little, or zero input from their employees. This style puts the greatest emphasis on the well being of the employees. It also benefits management by relieving the pressure that comes from having to weigh pros and cons all the time before deciding which path is the right one. It gives us the chance to hear from others, and learn more about who they are. And, it can serve as a catalyst for new friendships, partnerships, and social connections. Management plays an important role in strengthening the bond amongst the employees and making them work together as a single unit. There’s little room for error here, and discipline for mistakes is often swift and severe. We can try to tip-toe around it, and may succeed for a while, but sooner or later everything that gets swept under the rug boils to the surface. A laissez-faire management style can work very well in creative environments where risk taking is necessary to move the business forward, such as with Silicon-Valley-type tech startups. There is a crisis 2. “Management is an art of getting things done through and with the people in formally organized groups. This style is best used when timely decisions must be made to avert or respond to crises. The “do it the way I tell you” manager 2. It’s also important to note that these styles can be interchanged with one another depending on the circumstance. It is an integral part of every organization irrespective of its niche as management is what leads to the fulfillment of the goals effectively and efficiently. To be successful, the persuasive style requires that subordinates trust management and actively want to be involved in the brainstorming process. Which of these management styles speaks to you the most? Or is it perhaps something more — something deeper, something more intuitive? This style is great for vetting out complex decisions, such as product development and B2B services. 1. Because in this management style employees are put first and output is placed second, there is some risk of mediocre employee performance. All rights reserved. These abstract qualities are necessary in determining what management style is best used in leading you and your team to success in the marketplace. And that’s okay! Conflict, for the most part, is unavoidable. The DIRECTIVE (Coercive) style has the primary objective of immediate compliance from employees: 1. Because conflict simply indicates that people have morals, beliefs, and ideals and that they aren’t willing to abandon these beliefs because someone else thinks otherwise. According to Grace College online degree programs, there are currently 6 universally accepted management styles used in business today: 1. She revels in the thrill of exploration, whether it be new cultures, new landscapes, or new ways to bring on the happy. In this managing role, the manager will have a hands-on approach to coaching and encouraging new skillsets in subordinates. This may sometimes slow company progress, but it does help boost team morale, as all employees feel valued and trusted. Having values and beliefs is good, and expressing those ideas is also good. On the other hand, anyone who is left out of these discussions will feel they’re the victim of favoritism and are more likely move on. As the name would suggest, these leaders do their job by listening, sometimes while actually “walking around” the facility. Why? In this style, managers … In a strange way, conflict brings us closer to others, providing an intimate look into another person’s deeply held convictions and ideas. Shannon Terrell is a writer based in Toronto, Canada. by Shannon Terrell It’s great to have a software that…. If you’re in such a position, how do you manage those you work with? Consultative... 3. A pacesetting manager will complete tasks to a high degree to excellence to serve as an example for employees. The laissez-faire manager can best be described as a keen mentor to their employees, rather than a primary decision maker. Authoritative. Now, while not entirely true (some conflicts are avoidable! The consultative management style is very similar to autocratic, with one small exception. Ultimately, the consultative leader will make decisions based on what’s best for the business, while doing their best to make employees happy. Conflict is a natural and healthy part of life! A participative manager will seek to receive the contributions of all their subordinates before making decisions. Critical factors such as sales, client care, innovation, and employee satisfaction rates fall by the wayside and may never reach their full potential in your organization. When deviations are risky Not effective when: 1. Employees are highly skilled – they become frustrated and resentful at the micromanaging. Democracy, as a management style, can be very rewarding to all involved and has the potential to make more decisions that lead to a successful outcome. I devoted…, This year has forced business owners to re-evaluate the things that matter most in their business models — efficiency, sustainability,…, Most entrepreneurs inherently know that in order to get and retain customers, it is critical to develop strong customer relationships.…, function v_mailget() { var x = document.forms["mailget_form"]["subs_email"].value; var atpos = x.indexOf("@"); var dotpos = x.lastIndexOf(". 1. The two march hand in hand, and there isn’t much that can be done about avoiding it. Internal factors include the overall organizational and corporate culture of the company, as well as policies, priorities, employee engagement and staff skill levels. This type of manager is super friendly. Conflict, when navigated well, can be a wonderful opportunity for growth. 6 Management Styles: Which One is Yours? After setting their team’s vision and overarching strategy, visionary managers usually let their employees get to work on their own terms, as long as they’re productive. Sound far-fetched? Which management style do you think is the most effective? Management is what directs the efforts of the group towards a definite purpose. Conflict is merely the convergence of differing opinions. Conflict can be beneficial. Some have key skills of a top manager. Copyright © 2008-2019 Noobpreneur.com. The manager that utilizes this style will expect full compliance from their subordinates. Get members-only entrepreneurial tips and insights, as well as the recap from Noobpreneur.com – delivered monthly. This style is based on the philosophy that two heads are better than one and that everyone deserves to have a say, no matter what their position or title. A democratic management style works much in the way the name suggests. Autocratic. The Directive or Coercive Style. Which style do you feel best fits you, based on your personality? Managers will only check in on their team to make sure they’re on the right track or to share new insights. If we only ever accepted what others told us at face value and never bothered to question things for ourselves, who knows what wild nonsense we might believe? This style, also called the democratic style of management, encourages the active participation of all employees. A ‘put people first’ strategy, the affiliative manager seeks to make their subordinates feel valued and satisfied. Autocratic. If we are willing to accept that conflict is natural, and unavoidable, we’re much more willing to grapple with the challenges it poses.