His priorities are clear: wealth and honor are trifling concerns … The Socratic call to become aware of one’s own ignorance finds its parallel in the Kierkegaardian call to recognize one’s own failing to truly live as a Christian. There are a number of complications with this interpretive thesis, and many of them focus on the portrayal of Socrates. He is usually described as unattractive in appearance and short in stature, and he apparently rarely washed or changed his clothes. For instance, Plato wrote extensive dialogues (Plato’s Dialogues) where the main character in the conversation was his tutor Socrates. This sign was accessible only to Socrates, private and internal to his own mind. Socrates opens his defense speech by defending himself against his older accusers (Apology 18a), claiming they have poisoned the minds of his jurors since they were all young men. If man indeed has a soul of divine origin (as opposed to established beliefs, Socrates argues that the gods do not suffer from human passions), we understand the need for greater awareness and the requirement of “Know thyself own “formula inscribed on the pediment of the temple of Delphi. Having knowingly agreed to live under the city's laws, he implicitly subjected himself to the possibility of being accused of crimes by its citizens and judged guilty by its jury. Right until his death, Socrates maintained that the most virtuous way to respond to injustice was not more injustice. Though Socrates inquires after the nature of virtue, he does not claim to know it, and certainly does not ask to be paid for his conversations. Though Socrates is not present in every Platonic dialogue, he is in the majority of them, often acting as the main interlocutor who drives the conversation. Meno 87c-89a suggests that knowledge of the good guides the soul toward happiness (cf. World History Edu © 2020. Socrates does not just speak ironically but is ironic.